Expanding syphilis test uptake using rapid dual self-testing for syphilis and HIV among men who have sex with men in China: A multiarm randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low syphilis testing uptake is a major public health issue among men who have sex with men (MSM) in many low- and middle-income countries. Syphilis self-testing (SST) may complement and extend facility-based testing. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and costs of providing SST on increasing syphilis testing uptake among MSM in China. METHODS AND FINDINGS: An open-label, parallel 3-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted between January 7, 2020 and July 17, 2020. Men who were at least 18 years of age, had condomless anal sex with men in the past year, reported not testing for syphilis in the last 6 months, and had a stable residence with mailing addresses were recruited from 124 cities in 26 Chinese provinces. Using block randomization with blocks of size 12, enrolled participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) into 3 arms: standard of care arm, standard SST arm, and lottery incentivized SST arm (1 in 10 chance to win US$15 if they had a syphilis test). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who tested for syphilis during the trial period and confirmed with photo verification and between arm comparisons were estimated with risk differences (RDs). Analyses were performed on a modified intention-to-treat basis: Participants were included in the complete case analysis if they had initiated at least 1 follow-up survey. The Syphilis/HIV Duo rapid test kit was used. A total of 451 men were enrolled. In total, 136 (90·7%, 136/150) in the standard of care arm, 142 (94·0%, 142/151) in the standard of SST arm, and 137 (91·3%, 137/150) in the lottery incentivized SST arm were included in the final analysis. The proportion of men who had at least 1 syphilis test during the trial period was 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.5% to 71.3%, p = 0.001) in the standard SST arm, 65.7% (95% CI: 57.7% to 73.6%, p = 0.0002) in the lottery incentivized SST arm, and 14.7% (95% CI: 8.8% to 20.7%, p < 0.001) in the standard of care arm. The estimated RD between the standard SST and standard of care arm was 48.7% (95% CI: 37.8% to 58.4%, p < 0.001). The majority (78.5%, 95% CI: 72.7% to 84.4%, p < 0.001) of syphilis self-testers reported never testing for syphilis. The cost per person tested was US$26.55 for standard SST, US$28.09 for the lottery incentivized SST, and US$66.19 for the standard of care. No study-related adverse events were reported during the study duration. Limitation was that the impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) restrictions may have accentuated demand for decentralized testing. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to standard of care, providing SST significantly increased the proportion of MSM testing for syphilis in China and was cheaper (per person tested). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900022409.

Diagnostics for COVID-19: moving from pandemic response to control.

Diagnostics have proven to be crucial to the COVID-19 pandemic response. There are three major methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection and their role has evolved during the course of the pandemic. Molecular tests such as PCR are highly sensitive and specific at detecting viral RNA, and are recommended by WHO for confirming diagnosis in individuals who are symptomatic and for activating public health measures. Antigen rapid detection tests detect viral proteins and, although they are less sensitive than molecular tests, have the advantages of being easier to do, giving a faster time to result, of being lower cost, and able to detect infection in those who are most likely to be at risk of transmitting the virus to others. Antigen rapid detection tests can be used as a public health tool for screening individuals at enhanced risk of infection, to protect people who are clinically vulnerable, to ensure safe travel and the resumption of schooling and social activities, and to enable economic recovery. With vaccine roll-out, antibody tests (which detect the host's response to infection or vaccination) can be useful surveillance tools to inform public policy, but should not be used to provide proof of immunity, as the correlates of protection remain unclear. All three types of COVID-19 test continue to have a crucial role in the transition from pandemic response to pandemic control.

Has COVID-19 changed the approach to HIV diagnosis?: A multicentric Italian experience.

ABSTRACT: The occurrence of COVID-19 pandemic had a significant negative effect on health care systems over the last year. Health care providers were forced to focus mainly on COVID-19 patients, neglecting in many cases equally important diseases, both acute and chronic. Therefore, also screening and diagnostic strategies for HIV could have been significantly impaired.This retrospective, multicenter, observational study aimed at assessing the number and characteristics of new HIV/AIDS diagnoses during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and compared characteristics of people living with HIV at diagnosis between pre- and post-COVID-19 era (2019 vs 2020).Our results showed a significant reduction of HIV diagnoses during pandemic. By contrast, people living with HIV during pandemic were older and were diagnosed in earlier stage of disease (considering CD4+ T cell count) compared to those who were diagnosed the year before. Moreover, there was a significant decrease of new HIV diagnoses among men who have sex with men, probably for the impact of social distancing and restriction applied by the Italian Government. Late presentation incidence, if numbers in 2020 were lower than those in 2019, is still an issue.Routinely performing HIV testing in patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection is identifying and linking to care underdiagnosed people living with HIV earlier. Thus, combined tests (HIV and SARS-CoV-2) should be implemented in patients with SARS-CoV-2 symptoms overlapping HIV's ones. Lastly, our results lastly showed how urgent implementation of a national policy for HIV screening is necessary.

Analysis of a COVID-19 Prescreening Process in an Outpatient Clinic at a University Hospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: To minimize nosocomial infection against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), most hospitals conduct a prescreening process to evaluate the patient or guardian of any symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 or exposure to a COVID-19 patient at entrances of hospital buildings. In our hospital, we have implemented a two-level prescreening process in the outpatient clinic: an initial prescreening process at the entrance of the outpatient clinic (PPEO) and a second prescreening process is repeated in each department. If any symptoms or epidemiological history are identified at the second level, an emergency code is announced through the hospital's address system. The patient is then guided outside through a designated aisle. In this study, we analyze the cases missed in the PPEO that caused the emergency code to be applied. METHODS: All cases reported from March 2020 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. We calculated the incidence of cases missed by the PPEO per 1,000 outpatients and compared the incidence between first-time hospital visitors and those visiting for the second time or more; morning and afternoon office hours; and days of the week. RESULTS: During the study period, the emergency code was applied to 449 cases missed by the PPEO. Among those cases, 20.7% were reported in otorhinolaryngology, followed by 11.6% in gastroenterology, 5.8% in urology, and 5.8% in dermatology. Fever was the most common symptom (59.9%), followed by cough (19.8%). The incidence of cases per 1,000 outpatients was significantly higher among first-time visitors than among those visiting for the second time or more (1.77 [confidence interval (CI), 1.44-2.10] vs. 0.59 [CI, 0.52-0.65], respectively) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fever was the most common symptom missed by the PPEO, and otorhinolaryngology and gastroenterology most frequently reported missed cases. Cases missed by the PPEO were more likely to occur among first-time visitors than returning visitors. The results obtained from this study can provide insights or recommendations to other healthcare facilities in operating prescreening processes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A Global lmmunological Observatory to meet a time of pandemics.

SARS-CoV-2 presents an unprecedented international challenge, but it will not be the last such threat. Here, we argue that the world needs to be much better prepared to rapidly detect, define and defeat future pandemics. We propose that a Global Immunological Observatory and associated developments in systems immunology, therapeutics and vaccine design should be at the heart of this enterprise.

A review of studies on the COVID-19 epidemic crisis disease with a preventive approach.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a highly contagious acute respiratory syndrome and has been declared a pandemic in more than 209 countries worldwide. At the time of writing, no preventive vaccine has been developed and tested in the community. This study was conducted to review studies aimed at preventing the spread of the coronavirus worldwide. METHODS: This study was a review of the evidence-based literature and was conducted by searching databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect, until April 2020. The search was performed based on keywords including "coronavirus", "COVID-19", and "prevention". The list of references in the final studies has also been re-reviewed to find articles that might not have been obtained through the search. The guidelines published by trustworthy organizations such as the World Health Organization and Center for Disease Control have been used in this study. CONCLUSION: So far, no vaccine or definitive treatment for COVID-19 has been invented, and the disease has become a pandemic. Therefore, observation of hand hygiene, disinfection of high-touch surfaces, observation of social distance, and lack of presence in public places are recommended as preventive measures. Moreover, to control the situation and to reduce the incidence of the virus, some of the measures taken by the decision-making bodies and the guidelines of the deterrent institutions to strengthen telecommuting of employees and reduce the presence of people in the community and prevent unnecessary activities, are very important.

SARS-CoV-2 screening of asymptomatic health care workers: experience of a General hospital.

Health care workers (HCWs) are at major risk to be infected by SARS-CoV-2 and transmit the virus to the patients. Furthermore, travels are a major factor in the diffusion of the virus. We report our experience regarding the screening of asymptomatic HCWs returning from holidays, following the issue of a national guideline on 08/20/2020. The organization of the occupational health department and the clinical laboratory was adapted in order to start the screening on August, 24, 2020. All HCWs tested for SARS-CoV-2 the week before and 4 weeks after the implementation of the screening were included. The mean number of tests was analyzed per working day and working week. Overall, 502 (31.4%) HCWs were tested for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period. The mean number of HCWs tested per working day was 27.1. HCWs accounted for 36.9% (n = 167) and 11.2% (n = 84) of the tests performed in the 1st and the 4th week following the implementation of the guidelines. The number of tests performed each week in HCWs increased by at least 20-fold after the implementation of the guidelines. No asymptomatic HCW was tested positive. Screening of asymptomatic HCWs was poorly effective in the context of low circulation of the virus. We suggest giving priority to infection prevention and control measures and screening of symptomatic subjects and asymptomatic contacts.

Prevention of the spread of SARS COV-2 by Rapid Antigenic Tests on the passengers entering an Italian seaport.

Abstract: Out of 38,282 passengers entering Italy at a major seaport, submitted to SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigenic test, 272 (0.6%) resulted positive and 212 (93.4%) were confirmed positive by qRT-PCR, leaving a 0.6% of false positive. Those resident in the area under control of the same Local Health Authority of the seaport were immediately submitted to isolation and investigated for contact tracing, the others notified to their Local Health Authority which did the same in the following day. This procedure was made possible by a full-time dedication of the local healthcare workers who managed all the passengers disembarking around the clock along the months of the emergency.

Bonuses and pitfalls of a paperless drive-through screening and COVID-19: A field report.

As the world witnessed the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2, the World Health Organization has called for governing bodies worldwide to intensify case findings, contact tracing, monitoring, and quarantine or isolation of contacts with COVID-19. Drive-through (DT) screening is a form of case detection which has recently gain preference globally. Proper implementation of this system can help remediate the outbreak.

Modelling the impact of changes to abdominal aortic aneurysm screening and treatment services in England during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The National Health Service (NHS) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme (NAAASP) in England screens 65-year-old men. The programme monitors those with an aneurysm, and early intervention for large aneurysms reduces ruptures and AAA-related mortality. AAA screening services have been disrupted following COVID-19 but it is not known how this may impact AAA-related mortality, or where efforts should be focussed as services resume. METHODS: We repurposed a previously validated discrete event simulation model to investigate the impact of COVID-19-related service disruption on key outcomes. This model was used to explore the impact of delayed invitation and reduced attendance in men invited to screening. Additionally, we investigated the impact of temporarily suspending scans, increasing the threshold for elective surgery to 7cm and increasing drop-out in the AAA cohort under surveillance, using data from NAAASP to inform the population. FINDINGS: Delaying invitation to primary screening up to two years had little impact on key outcomes whereas a 10% reduction in attendance could lead to a 2% lifetime increase in AAA-related deaths. In surveillance patients, a 1-year suspension of surveillance or increase in the elective threshold resulted in a 0.4% increase in excess AAA-related deaths (8% in those 5-5.4cm at the start). Longer suspensions or a doubling of drop-out from surveillance would have a pronounced impact on outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Efforts should be directed towards encouraging men to attend AAA screening service appointments post-COVID-19. Those with AAAs on surveillance should be prioritised as the screening programme resumes, as changes to these services beyond one year are likely to have a larger impact on surgical burden and AAA-related mortality.

Cancer Screening in the Coronavirus Pandemic Era: Adjusting to a New Situation.

PURPOSE: The coronavirus-induced pandemic has put great pressure on health systems worldwide. Nonemergency health services, such as cancer screening, have been scaled down or withheld as a result of travel restrictions and resources being redirected to manage the pandemic. The present article discusses the challenges to cancer screening implementation in the pandemic environment, suggesting ways to optimize services for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: The manuscript was drafted by a team of public health specialists with expertise in implementation and monitoring of cancer screening. A scoping review of literature revealed the lack of comprehensive guidance on continuation of cancer screening in the midst of waxing and waning of infection. The recommendations in the present article were based on the advisories issued by different health agencies and professional bodies and the authors' understanding of the best practices to maintain quality-assured cancer screening. RESULTS: A well-coordinated approach is required to ensure that essential health services such as cancer management are maintained and elective services are not threatened, especially because of resource constraints. In the context of cancer screening, a few changes in invitation strategies, screening and management protocols and program governance need to be considered to fit into the new normal situation. Restoring public trust in providing efficient and safe services should be one of the key mandates for screening program reorganization. This may be a good opportunity to introduce innovations (eg, telehealth) and consider de-implementing non-evidence-based practices. It is necessary to consider increased spending on primary health care and incorporating screening services in basic health package. CONCLUSION: The article provides guidance on reorganization of screening policies, governance, implementation, and program monitoring.

Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from international arrivals: Xiaotangshan Designated Hospital, China.

A surge in the number of international arrivals awaiting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) screening overwhelmed health-care workers and depleted medical resources in designated hospitals in Beijing, China in March 2020. The People's Government of Beijing Municipality therefore issued a policy which required the mandatory transfer of all asymptomatic passengers arriving from a foreign country to designated quarantine hotels, and the transfer of passengers with fever or respiratory symptoms to designated hospitals. Xiaotangshan Designated Hospital, a severe acute respiratory syndrome hospital in 2003, was rapidly renovated and put into operation with the main tasks of screening and isolating symptomatic international arrivals at Beijing Capital International Airport, providing basic medical care for mild to moderate COVID-19-positive cases, and rapidly referring severe to critical COVID-19-positive cases to higher-level hospitals. During the month-long period of its operation, 2171 passengers were screened and 53 were confirmed as having COVID-19 (six severe to critical). We describe how the use of Xiaotangshan Designated Hospital in this way enabled the efficient grouping and assessment of passengers arriving from a foreign country, the provision of optimal patient care without compromising public safety and the prioritization of critically ill patients requiring life-saving treatment. The designated hospital is a successful example of the World Health Organization's recommendation to renovate existing medical infrastructures to improve the COVID-19 response capacity. The flexible design of Xiaotangshan Designated Hospital means that it can be repurposed and reopened at any time to respond to the changing pandemic conditions.

En mars 2020, la brusque hausse du nombre d'arrivées internationales en attente de dépistage de la maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) a submergé les professionnels de la santé et épuisé les ressources médicales dans les hôpitaux de référence à Beijing, en Chine. Le gouvernement populaire de la municipalité de Beijing a réagi en ordonnant que tous les passagers asymptomatiques en provenance d'un pays étranger soient transférés vers des hôtels reconvertis en centres de quarantaine, et que ceux manifestant de la fièvre ou des symptômes respiratoires soient envoyés dans des hôpitaux de référence. L'hôpital de référence Xiaotangshan, construit en 2003 pour lutter contre le syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère, a rapidement été rénové et mis en service. Ses tâches principales: dépister et isoler les passagers internationaux symptomatiques débarquant au Beijing Capital International Airport, prodiguer les soins médicaux de base aux cas positifs de COVID-19 souffrant d'une forme légère à modérée, et adresser dès que possible les cas positifs de COVID-19 dans un état grave ou critique aux hôpitaux spécialisés. En l'espace d'un mois, 2171 passagers ont été testés et 53 se sont révélés positifs à la COVID-19 (6 étant dans un état grave ou critique). Nous décrivons la façon dont l'hôpital de référence Xiaotangshan a ainsi permis de regrouper et d'évaluer efficacement les arrivées en provenance de l'étranger, d'offrir une prise en charge optimale des patients sans compromettre la sécurité publique, et d'établir des priorités afin que les malades gravement atteints puissent bénéficier d'un traitement dans les plus brefs délais. Cet hôpital de référence est un exemple réussi de la mise en œuvre de la recommandation formulée par l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé: rénover les infrastructures médicales existantes afin d'améliorer les capacités de lutte contre la COVID-19. Grâce à sa conception flexible, l'hôpital Xiaotangshan peut être réutilisé et rouvert à n'importe quel moment pour réagir à un contexte pandémique en perpétuelle évolution.

Un aumento del número de llegadas de vuelos internacionales en espera de la detección del coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) sobrecargó al personal sanitario y agotó los recursos médicos en los hospitales designados de Pekín (China) en marzo de 2020. Por lo tanto, la policía del Gobierno Popular del municipio de Pekín se tuvo que hacer cargo del traslado obligatorio de todos los pasajeros asintomáticos que llegaran de un país extranjero a los hoteles de cuarentena designados, y el traslado de los pasajeros con fiebre o síntomas respiratorios a los hospitales designados. El hospital designado de Xiaotangshan, un hospital especializado en el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo en 2003, se rehabilitó rápidamente y se puso en funcionamiento con las tareas principales de examinar y aislar a los sintomáticos que llegaban al Aeropuerto Internacional de Pekín, proporcionando atención médica básica a los casos positivos de COVID-19 de leves a moderados, y derivando rápidamente los casos positivos de COVID-19 de graves a críticos a hospitales de nivel superior. Durante el mes que duró su funcionamiento, se examinó a 2.171 pasajeros y se confirmó que 53 tenían la COVID-19 (6 de ellos con intensidad de grave a crítica). Describimos cómo el uso del hospital designado de Xiaotangshan permitió agrupar y evaluar eficazmente a los pasajeros que llegaban de un país extranjero, prestar una atención óptima a los pacientes sin comprometer la seguridad pública y priorizar a los pacientes en estado crítico que requerían tratamiento para salvar su vida. El hospital designado es un ejemplo de éxito de la recomendación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud de renovar las infraestructuras médicas existentes para mejorar la capacidad de respuesta ante la COVID-19. El diseño flexible del hospital designado de Xiaotangshan significa que puede utilizarse y volver a habilitarse en cualquier momento para responder a las condiciones cambiantes de la pandemia.

Improving care of migrants is key for viral hepatitis elimination in Europe.

By 2040, deaths from chronic viral hepatitis worldwide are projected to exceed those from human immunodeficiency virus infection, tuberculosis and malaria combined. The burden of this disease is predominantly carried by low-resource countries in Africa and Asia. In resource-rich countries, the epidemiological spread of viral hepatitis is partially driven by migrant movements from areas of high endemicity. In the last decade, Member States of the European Union and the European Economic Area have experienced an unprecedented influx of migrants, which has resulted in the polarization of political views about migration. In addition, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has worsened the economic and health conditions of migrants and contributed to hostility to ensuring their health rights. Moreover, the implementation of hostile laws in some host nations has increased the vulnerability of marginalized migrant subgroups, such as asylum seekers and undocumented individuals. These developments have complicated the historical challenge of identifying high-risk migrant groups for screening and treatment. However, if European countries can apply the simplified assessment tools and diagnostic tests for viral hepatitis that have been used for decentralized screening and monitoring in resource-poor countries, the uptake of care by migrants could be dramatically increased. Given the global calls for the elimination of viral hepatitis, European nations should recognize the importance of treating this vulnerable migrant population. Political and health strategies need to be adapted to meet this challenge and help eliminate viral hepatitis globally.

D'ici 2040, les décès causés par l'hépatite virale chronique dans le monde devraient dépasser ceux dus à trois grandes maladies réunies: l'infection au virus de l'immunodéficience humaine, la tuberculose et la malaria. Le fardeau que représente cette affection repose surtout sur les pays disposant de ressources limitées en Afrique et en Asie. Dans les pays riches en ressources, la propagation épidémiologique de l'hépatite virale est en partie liée aux mouvements migratoires depuis les zones à endémicité élevée. Au cours de la dernière décennie, les États membres de l'Union européenne et l'Espace économique européen ont connu un afflux de migrants sans précédent qui a polarisé les opinions politiques concernant la migration. En outre, la pandémie de maladie à coronavirus 2019 a aggravé la situation économique et sanitaire des migrants, contribuant à l'animosité ambiante à l'égard du respect de leurs droits en matière de santé. L'adoption de lois hostiles dans certains pays d'accueil a également accru la vulnérabilité des sous-groupes de migrants marginalisés, tels que les demandeurs d'asile et les sans-papiers. Des conditions qui compliquent la tâche d'identification des groupes de migrants à haut risque pour le dépistage et le traitement. Néanmoins, si les pays européens pouvaient appliquer les outils d'évaluation simplifiés et les tests de diagnostic de l'hépatite virale, qui ont été employés pour la surveillance et le dépistage décentralisé dans les pays disposant de ressources limitées, la prise en charge des migrants pourrait nettement s'améliorer. Compte tenu des nombreux appels internationaux à éliminer l'hépatite virale, les nations européennes devraient reconnaître l'importance de soigner ces populations de migrants vulnérables. Les stratégies politiques et sanitaires doivent être adaptées afin de relever ce défi et de contribuer à éradiquer l'hépatite virale dans le monde.

Para 2040, se prevé que las muertes por hepatitis vírica crónica en todo el mundo superen a las causadas por la infección del virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana, la tuberculosis y la malaria juntas. La carga de esta enfermedad recae sobre todo en los países con recursos limitados de África y Asia. En los países ricos en recursos, la propagación epidemiológica de las hepatitis víricas se debe en parte a los movimientos migratorios desde las zonas altamente endémicas. En la última década, los Estados miembros de la Unión Europea y del Espacio Económico Europeo han experimentado una afluencia de inmigrantes sin precedentes, lo que ha polarizado las opiniones políticas sobre la inmigración. Además, la pandemia de la enfermedad del coronavirus de 2019 ha empeorado las condiciones económicas y sanitarias de los inmigrantes y ha contribuido a la hostilidad para garantizar sus derechos sanitarios. Además, la aplicación de leyes hostiles en algunas naciones de acogida ha aumentado la vulnerabilidad de subgrupos de inmigrantes marginados, como los solicitantes de asilo y los indocumentados. Estos acontecimientos han complicado el reto histórico de identificar a los grupos de inmigrantes de alto riesgo para su detección y tratamiento. Sin embargo, si los países europeos pueden aplicar las herramientas de evaluación y las pruebas de diagnóstico simplificadas para la hepatitis vírica que se han utilizado para el cribado y el seguimiento descentralizados en los países con pocos recursos, la aceptación de la atención por parte de los inmigrantes podría aumentar drásticamente. Dados los llamamientos mundiales para la eliminación de la hepatitis vírica, las naciones europeas deberían reconocer la importancia de tratar a esta población inmigrante vulnerable. Es necesario adaptar las estrategias políticas y sanitarias para hacer frente a este reto y ayudar a eliminar la hepatitis vírica a nivel mundial.

Mass Screening Is Associated with Low Rates of Acute Kidney Injury among COVID-19 Patients in Hong Kong.

INTRODUCTION: Renal involvement in COVID-19 is less well characterized in settings with vigilant public health surveillance, including mass screening and early hospitalization. We assessed kidney complications among COVID-19 patients in Hong Kong, including the association with risk factors, length of hospitalization, critical presentation, and mortality. METHODS: Linked electronic records of all patients with confirmed COVID-19 from 5 major designated hospitals were extracted. Duplicated records due to interhospital transferal were removed. Primary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI). Secondary outcomes were AKI-associated mortality, incident renal replacement therapy (RRT), intensive care admission, prolonged hospitalization and disease course (defined as >90th percentile of hospitalization duration [35 days] and duration from symptom onset to discharge [43 days], respectively), and change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Patients were further stratified into being symptomatic or asymptomatic. RESULTS: Patients were characterized by young age (median: 38.4, IQR: 28.4-55.8 years) and short time (median: 5, IQR: 2-9 days) from symptom onset to admission. Among the 591 patients, 22 (3.72%) developed AKI and 4 (0.68%) required RRT. The median time from symptom onset to in-hospital AKI was 15 days. AKI increased the odds of prolonged hospitalization and disease course by 2.0- and 3.5-folds, respectively. Estimated GFR 24 weeks post-discharge reduced by 7.51 and 1.06 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus baseline (upon admission) in the AKI and non-AKI groups, respectively. The incidence of AKI was comparable between asymptomatic (4.8%, n = 3/62) and symptomatic (3.7%, n = 19/519) patients. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of AKI among COVID-19 patients in Hong Kong is low, which could be attributable to a vigilant screening program and early hospitalization. Among patients who developed in-hospital AKI, the duration of hospitalization is prolonged and kidney function impairment can persist for up to 6 months post-discharge. Mass surveillance for COVID-19 is warranted in identifying asymptomatic subjects for earlier AKI management.